I Hate To Say ‘I Told You So’

August 6, 2009 at 3:10 PM (Constitutional, Educational, General, States' Rights, political)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Let’s revisit my original article on Obamanism vs. Marxism and just see where we are six plus months into his administration.

In ‘A Comparative Study – Marxism vs Obamanism’, I compared the process of introducing a Marxist regime to an otherwise Democratic Republic (we are, after all, a Republic, not a true democracy). I still truly believe we are on course for such a dramatic transition and the largest majority of our populace has absolutely no idea that this is actually happening.

They don’t realize it because the vast majority of our populace is, unfortunately, too young to realize they’ve been hoodwinked. They’ve been indoctrinated in our schools. How do I know this? Well, schoolbook publishers and editorial staff freely admit that they sanitize books so that no one group can possibly be offended by any one word in their textbooks. Take, for example, the word “American”. This word can no longer be used in textbooks! Don’t believe me? Well, the new translation for this word, now taboo in our society, is “Person(s) of the United States”. Puhlease! But I digress….I was going to talk about Marxism vs. Obamanism and where we are in the transition. Just keep in mind that the lemmings are still running toward the cliffs.

Step 1: Direct massive military power that results at once in the desired communist take-over. Examples of this are found in the Baltic states (although this step is not required to achieve).

Mr. Obama has not yet used a formal military force. I no longer believe that he would not dare to do so as I originally mentioned in my first blog on this subject. At this time, though, he has firmly placed in his pocket, walking lock-step with him, the SEIU, the AFL-CIO, and other heavy-hitting union workers and agitators, along with the wholly corrupt group, ACORN. During the election cycle, they falsified voter registrations. He further usurped the states during the election cycle by engaging Democrat officials of each state in mishandling voter ballots, particularly in Minnesota (where more votes were counted than there were residents in the districts that Franken took) and in Ohio (where people were bussed in from other states to register to vote and where college students and ACORN volunteers aggregiously falsified voter registration documents) and in Nevada (where ACORN continues to be investigated for voter fraud). He acquired and is holding firmly to college students in his civilian army because of their malleability. They hear only one side of any argument and anyone who dares to believe other than the liberal point of view in the college setting is dehumanized and villianized by the professors. He has his army – it just doesn’t wear a uniform equipped with a gun.

Step 2: Always used to the utmost advantage is the saturation of a target country with propaganda.

Well, folks – it’s Obama time all the time. There’s not a single newscast in this country from coast to coast that does not feature Mr. Obama’s name or likeness in some story. Whether it is a discussion of Mr. and Mrs. Obama going out on a date, their children, his blatent lies about healthcare reform, or his “beer” diplomacy in a situation he should never have opened his mouth about, it’s Obama all the time. The liberally-dominant mass media cannot seem to get enough of Mr. Obama, even though they have started to express distaste for the amount of air-time he is demanding. His chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel, does not ask the stations for air-time. He demands it by talking not to the television station presidents, but rather by going directly to the companies that own the television stations. It’s almost as if he’s telling them, ‘hey – it’s okay – if you don’t want to run our press conference, no problem – we’ll just send our goons over and make you change your mind!’ Meanwhile, so-called journalists (really just talking heads without an original thought) such as Keith Olberman and Hollywood rejects who can’t even tell the truth about the Tea Party patriots (like Jeneane Garafalo – who’s the real racist in the room????), keep spouting the drivel of the White House Administration. Drive-by news media continue to persist in not telling the whole story or by slanting the story to Obama’s favor by not recognizing or even delving into the details of a piece. Not one reporter has discussed the town hall meetings with those actually attending the meetings. Instead, they talk to the congressmen and the White House Administration press secretary to create their story. ‘Don’t bother with the little person – he/she doesn’t matter – let’s talk about how we can spin this to Obama’s advantage’ – this is the thinking of the primetime news anchor.

Step 3: Creation within the target country of mass agitation. Any issues at hand are used.

Boy! Need I really delve into this one? The two “at hand” issues right now are the economy and healthcare reform. Pelosi, Reid, Obama, and their hacks are using the town hall meetings where people are expressing genuine disgust with the performance of their representatives and this healthcare bill that would hog-tie our options for receiving any form of healthcare in a timely manner, would cause our parents and grandparents (and one day us) to have to make repeated end-of-life decisions from the age of 65 years, and which would deny coverage to any person the governement-appointed committee deems not worthy to receive life-saving care as their bailywick for mass agitation. Obama is well on his way in this regards. As to the economy – his team has absolutely no idea what they’re doing. The Fed must be audited. If it were, we’d find that we are much, much worse off than we ever dreamed. The Fed runs without any restrictions. The Constitution does not permit the use of the Fed. It places the act of printing money and its management to the Congress, not to a private body that basically runs/creates/destroys our whole economy.

Obama originally used college students to create mass agitation – he told them last October to “go out and ‘get in their faces’” for whatever they disagree with common sense thinking individuals about.

Step 4: Infiltration

This was already achieved by Mr. Obama from the day he signed on to the Democrat Party. The National Democratic Socialist Party was, is and will always be his first party. The Communist party found its niche in the Democrat Party because it was the weaker of the two party system.

Step 5: Demoralization

The Republican Partyis clearly demoralized at this time. Everyone who is a registered Republican is sitting there wondering how we got ourselves to this point and what, if anything at all, can be done about it. Well, writing, talking, going to town hall meetings, voting with your feet, your mouth, and your brain are the ways by which we can regain that center right to mid-right, moral-loving society that we so desperately yearn for. 

Mr. Obama is brilliant at the “scare” technique which is the equivalent of demoralization. He uses phrases like, “right now”, “must be done to avoid disaster” and phrases similar to these in order to try to push things over on the American public. It’s urgent! Desperate times are upon us! Oh no! And then there’s Rahm Emmanuel. His phrase, “don’t let a crisis go to waste” makes anyone with half a brain sick to his/her stomach.

We were told that the “stimulus” package was supposed to spur our economy and bring us up out of the recession; that there were thousands of projects within the stimulus package that were “shovel ready”. There are big problems here folks. More than 3/4 of the stimulus won’t even take effect for another year.  What’s been distributed so far, six months in, is less than 3% of the total stimulus authorization. There are few, if any, substantiable jobs created or saved (despite what the White House may say) and those jobs that have been created have gone to large construction companies that already have a union workforce. See, the caveat of the bill is that those jobs created must be given preference to the unionized worker.

Step 6: Intimidation

Back in my original post, I talked about the Obama Thought Police and Truth Squads. Well, those thought police and truth squads are still out there. In the state of Missouri, the state police (and other sub-jurisdictions) have been told to pull over and treat as potential terrorists anyone who has an anti-Obama sticker on their vehicle or any sticker that they could potentially even remotely think is anti-government. Missouri is not the only state, but I find it somewhat interesting that Missouri was also the state where the District Attorney and prosecutor threatened to pursue anyone who speaks ill of Mr. Obama.

And, as if that weren’t enough, now, in the state of Florida, at least one US Representative now has the SEIU (Service Employees International Union – an Obama goon squad) escorting her to/from her town hall meetings in order to intimidate those individuals who disagree or intend to question the health care reform bill in open meeting. Other representatives in other states aren’t even going to hold town meetings by being there physically. They’re going to hold them by way of video phone or telephone conference so that they can control the meeting.

We have clearly entered the genre of intimidation.

Step 7: Gain the confidence of the people – study their problems, provide help for them, sell yourself as their friend in aiding them to achieve their goals.

Mr. Obama has done this with our youth – the college student, and with the illegal aliens (who have entered our country and expect others to support and provide for them without their having to go through the proper process to become legal residents/citizens).  Mr. Obama is clearly a good speaker (as long as he has his teleprompter), but speaking “off the cuff” is not one of his strong suits.

Step 8: Subversion

Mr. Obama has subverted the Congress (both Senate and House) to speak his message. They have denied the Republican minority party the right to put their own message out through mailings which is clearly the Republicans prerogative and is thus a violation of the free speech given them in the US Constitution. The Constitution itself has been subverted and continues to be subverted through strong-arm tactics of the Democrat party in the House, Senate and White House.

Step 9: The end – it is voluntary surrender to Communism and the loss of all freedoms.

Not if I have anything to say or do about it – not as long as there are freed0m-loving individuals out there who are fighting for the rights of all individuals in this country.

AFTER THE TAKEOVER

Step 1: Fulfill all promises made in gaining the people’s confidence.

Obama is trying to do this by pushing through, at breakneck speed, all of the programs he spoke about in his campaign – healthcare, taxes on those making more than $250,000 ($200,000 for individuals), and many others. He has further authorized the UN Diplomatic corps to agree to international law being part of the US code of justice and to vote affirmatively for the US to agree to allow UN dictates to say what our parents can and cannot do to/with their children.  He has directed Secretary Sebelius to determine “degrees of gender” (giving him the opportunity to give full/equal rights for marriage to anyone of any gender, particulary those who espouse themselves to be homosexual – a practice with which I wholeheartedly disagree). He has appointed and, as of this writing she has been confirmed, an associate justice to the supreme court who is a “legislate from the bench” justice.  He has already had Joe Biden (nobody messes with Joe) go to a “closed meeting” with the unions in Florida where they were having their lavish annual get-together (funny how no one complained about private jets, lavish spending, etc for the unions). There’s more to come folks – he has to get all of his promises done in the first year or his plan to remove all those “gifts” will be forced to happen more quickly.

Step 2: Disarm everyone, and confiscate all weapons. At the same time, activate a powerful secret police system.

Well, he’s successfully appointed Sonia Sotomayor to the bench. She’s clearly anti-gun possession in her stance. She’s clearly reverse racist in her rulings. Now that she’s on the bench of the Supreme Court, the removal of personal right to bear arms is quite likely. While I originally believed he’d have to achieve step 3 in this process first (since no item in these two lists has to be taken in direct order of presentation), I now believe that since he has Sotomayor on the bench, he may not have to arrest all of the Supreme Court. He has the ability to stack the court in his favor by appointing additional justices. Nowhere in the Constitution does it stipulate that there must be 9 judges. There have been and can be more. All he need do is appoint a 10th or 11th justice to the court and he has complete control of the Supreme Court at that point. Then he can arrest and remove from office any conservative justice from the court to solidify the hold he has.

As to the secret police system, Mr. Obama’s office has already begun the process of requesting anyone who “hears anything fishy” about the healthcare bill to rat on their fellow citizens.

Step 3: Shoot all of the leaders of the conquered country, and all potential leaders.

Originally, I indicated that he would have to dissolve the Supreme Court. I no longer believe this. He need only stack the court with additional bench legislators bringing the liberal majority to more than 60% so that no decision he wants can be overturned. All Republican leaders, governors, state house leaders, and US military officials would still have to be silenced in some fashion (either by imprisonment as political prisoners or by death).

Step 4: Take over all communications and transportation systems.

He continues to enjoy complete control over all of the liberally-dominant mass media and has had the Democrat-controlled Congress work to pass “fairness doctrine” legislation to silence talk radio that tends to be right-leaning. He needs this legislation to pass. In addition, he is attetmpting to place restrictions on internet and telephone communications by additional legislation.

As to transportation, democrats are attempting to pass legislation that would require GPS tracking devices to be placed in all vehicles that would allow the government to know where you are traveling, how often you use the road systems, and know your transportation habits.

Step 5: Set up the new government as the only employer or source of jobs. Everyone will be forced to work where the government dictates, doing what the government dictates and receiving for wages only what the government dictates.

The expansion of the federal government is occurring at breakneck speed. Mr. Obama has more than 22 “czars” who report to no one but him and are in charge of very sensitive areas of our federal government. They each have staffs. And, just in case you weren’t aware, Mrs. Obama has more staff than any first lady before her – 22 staff persons.

His setting up of the government as the only source of jobs is occurring – the federal government now owns two of our car manufacturers – General Motors and Chrysler/Dodge. It now owns or holds ownership position over hundreds, if not thousands of US banking institutions. That hold over private industry will not abate soon, if ever. He has dictated to and received cooperation from, Barney Frank, head of the House Banking Committee (the most powerful Congressional Committee), in order to achieve complete control over Wall Street. He will dictate wages, board seats, company management, and all other aspects of management of these companies and industries. It is real and it is happening.

Step 6: Take back anything given to the people in Step 1. This was always the plan and now it can be done safely.

Mr. Obama said, ‘no one earning less than $250,000 ($200,000 for individuals) will pay one penny more in taxes’. This will be safely reversed by year-end. By early 2010, every person will be paying more in taxes. Whether it is through cap and trade, health care, income taxes, taxes on your Health Spending Account (HSA), Flexible Spending Account (FSA), Individual Savings Plan (ISP), or some other formerly pre-tax dollars on your paycheck, the federal government will take it and tax it. You will be taxed on what you eat, taxed on what you wear, taxed on what you do or do not do. Regardless of what it is called  – fee, assessment or whatever – you will be seeing an increase in your taxes. This is inevitable.

Mr. Obama has said you will be able to keep your existing healthcare coverage. This is untrue. He said, in 2003, in a union meeting at which he spoke, that he envisions a “single payer healthcare system” (exactly what is in place in Canada and England, Germany and France). Why should your employer, who currently pays a handsome sum over and above whatever you contribute (your employer typically pays about 2/3 of the premium and you typically pay about 1/3), continue to pay for health care coverage when the employer would be better off paying the $2500 fine per employee per year? What employer will hire more than 15 employees if they can do the work with 13 or 14 so that they don’t have to pay for medical coverage? What makes anyone with a brain think that we will be able to keep our existing health care coverage when the federal government will automatically undercut any insurance company’s premiums?

Step 7: Set up a forced internal spy system – with everyone spying on everyone else and reporting to the secret police.

This is already happening – to go flag@whitehouse.gov if you doubt me. They have specifically requested that you report to them anyone who is speaking out against government healthcare reform. If this is not an internal spy system, I don’t know what is. If you still don’t beleive me, check out the “blog” page at whitehouse.gov. It’s there for all to see.

Step 8: Forbid all travel outside of a small area - such as a 10 mile circle. This will make virtually impossible any effective resistance or organization of any opposition group.

While this may seem stupid in this day and age, it is not. The federal government can still control where you go/what you do if it has control of the media and the internet. This blog could disappear any day just becasue of step 7 above. Someone could report my site to flag@whitehouse.gov if they so chose. Will it stop me from talking – absolutely not. Would it force me to find an alternate method of getting my beliefs out – absolutely yes. But forbidding travel and requiring each person to have a GPS system in their vehicles that allows the government to monitor your movements is possible and entirely probable in a future of marxism.

Mr. Obama may or may not be a natural born citizen of this country – frankly, I don’t know. But, what I do know, is that given the comparisons above, this man scares the begeezus out of me and he should scare you too.

Stand up for your freedoms. Don’t let this precious commodity be snuffed out. You, more than anyone, know what your freedom is worth. No one should be able to take it from you and no one should be able to endanger it. You deserve better than you have gotten from a man who simply promised “change”.

7 Comments

The International Crisis that Biden Talked About

February 15, 2009 at 11:52 PM (General, political)

Back on the campaign trail, gaff-a-day Biden talked about an “international crisis” that would test Mr. Obama within the first six months. He claimed that we would think them wrong but to stick with them because they will be right.  Quite a few people have speculated as to what that “international crisis” might be. I’m no different. There are so many options to choose from:

  • Iran’s nuclear capability
  • Iraq pull-out
  • Pakistan and the anticipated moves of Obama regarding crossing over into Pakistan from Afghanistan to hunt down Obama with or without Pakistan’s permission
  • North Korea’s nuclear capability and the ability now for them to launch medium and long-range missiles
  • Al Qaeda’s missions around the world to strike at us through the innocent

The list could just go on since every day there is another item to add to the list. But what’s not been discussed is our current economic crisis which is, in fact, international in nature. And, what’s more important in this international crisis is that every country (with exception of the US until now) has had a nationalized banking system. Now we, America, have a nationalized banking system that makes us much like the rest of the world. Our government has invested heavily and without many strings, in our country’s largest banks.

Now, I’m not the sharpest tack in the box when it comes to economics, but it seems to me that the reason this whole thing is so global is because every country’s economy was nationalized and globalized. Had countries not nationalized their banking systems, whole governments would not be having to sink funds into the private sector banks and businesses. Had governments not linked their economies together as Europe has done with the EU, they would not be suffering nearly as bad as they are. Our country is suffering because we’re forced to back every country’s ventures in some way or another, either militarily or economically, or socially.

I’m not espousing xenophobia But what I am espousing is the old phrase, “charity begins at home”.

We have to take care of our own houses – our economic house and our governmental house. Before we go spending hundreds of billions of dollars on other countries, some of which is in this spendulous bill, we need to concentrate on the needs here in our own country. This spendulous bill of $787 billion dollars (more than $1.3 trillion before it is even half paid off) does nothing serious about “stimulating” the US economy. And, to add to this, Mr. Obama (and to be fair, Mr. Bush) both began the process of nationalizing our economy. I believe Mr. Bush simply played into the hands of a stupid treasury secretary who had skunked him about the true nature of the problem and helped to manufacture the extreme situation. Nevertheless, TARP I ends at Mr. Bush’s doorstep and no other. But Mr. Obama has compounded, with the aid of a Socialist liberal agenda of the Democrat-controlled Congress and Senate, the already troubling situation that Mr. Bush’s administration began. Mr. Geithner, the new Administration’s treasury secretary, spouted a significant amount of non-speak last Tuesday and has absolutely no idea which direction to turn in order to undo the damage already done. This speaks quite clearly to his ineptitude and his lack of qualifications to handle the position he has been placed in.

Mr. Obama and Mr. Geithner will continue to nationalize our country’s banking system and, as can be readily believed, Democrat senators and representatives seem to have absolutely no problem with this occurring (as evidenced today on ABC’s This Week With George Stephanopolous) where the woman representative being interviewed (sorry I didn’t catch her name) specifically said she had no problem with nationalization. This is a purely Socialist/Marxist philosphy. In addition, they will begin the process of nationalizing otherwise private businesses such as these private banking institutions that remain private in order to mandate how much money one can make. This, again, is a Socialist/Marxist philosophy. He might as well invite Hugo Chavez to be on his cabinet.

Before the November election, true conservatives saw easily through Mr. Obama’s words to the Socialist/Marxist agenda he really seeks to institute in this country. Newsweek echoed that sentiment when it placed on its cover two hands shaking saying something like, “welcome to Socialism”.  What’s really actually surprising is that Newsweek would even comment on the matter since they are an extremely liberal news magazine. However, don’t think that Newsweek has suddenly changed fence sides. They commented that this was a good thing. But then again, what liberal magazine wouldn’t espouse Socialism as a good thing?

Had Mr. Obama and the Democrats voted to give a tax refund purposed to assist with the mortgage/lending crisis, most Americans would have applauded and cheered him as having made the correct decision. Facts are that most Americans can’t get any form of lending because the vast majority of us don’t have credit scores exceeding 720 which is the bottom line of who gets loans right now. (Basically, you can’t get a loan unless you don’t really need it. I certainly can’t get one right now. I’m in the same boat as most every other American when it comes to personal debt.) Instead, the Democrats voted to spend money on projects, most of which will do nothing to stimulate our economy in the near term, nor even in the long term. They’re spending money on projects that will only increase our national debt; institute government social projects, give money to groups like ACORN (over $4 billion available to them and we all know how they “help” with elections now, don’t we?); medical records mandates which will take away you and your physician’s decision-making by mandating who gets what medical care based on cost and age; mandating you turn over your medical records to build this massive database without giving you the opportunity to “opt out” so that you can maintain your right to privacy (and where will that end?); and many other so-called projects that have nothing to do with infrastructure re-building, stimulating the economy, or helping Americans who did the right thing and only bought what they could afford, to stay in their homes.

Personally, I think this international crisis that Biden was talking about is this economic “stimulus” package that will do absolutely nothing to stimulate the economy. Even the OMB says it won’t do what’s needed. And, what’s needed is for everyone to get their own economies in order and for our government to stop spending money it doesn’t have. We all just have to live within our personal means and stop asking for handouts from Uncle Sam. Uncle Sam has to stop asking for handouts and loans from other countries and has to stop giving money to other countries with their own hands out. The vicious cycle just has to end and we have to be big enough to say, “it’s going to hurt badly, but it will be the best for us to stop all this madness”.

Comments Off

Some Common Sense At Last

February 12, 2009 at 2:57 PM (Constitutional, political)

Senator Gregg, who was Obama’s second choice for Commerce Secretary, has just withdrawn his name from consideration. Of paramount importance in this decision was Obama’s mandate that the 2010 census be placed under White House purview. This, of course, should never be done because it would do much to politicize the census and the data could be unfairly manipulated to sway the membership of both house and senate to Democrat majority indefinitely. This is not sensible in a two party system, let alone in a federal republic with democratic principles.

What does this mean to all conservatives? It means that we will have a staunch voice in the Senate going forward for spending controls that the Democrat-controlled congress and senate would love to be able to quash.

From Senator Gregg’s office, the following statement was released:

Judd Gregg abruptly pulls out of the process of becoming Commerce Secretary.

I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.

However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.

Obviously the President requires a team that is fully supportive of all his initiatives.

I greatly admire President Obama and know our country will benefit from his leadership, but at this time I must withdraw my name from consideration for this position.

As we move forward, I expect there will be many issues and initiatives where I can and will work to assure the success of the President’s proposals. This will certainly be a goal of mine.

Kathy and I also want to specifically thank Governor Lynch and Bonnie Newman for their friendship and assistance during this period. In addition we wish to thank all the people, especially in New Hampshire, who have been so kind and generous in their supportive comments.

As a further matter of clarification, nothing about the vetting process played any role in this decision. I will continue to represent the people of New Hampshire in the United States Senate.

I am very thankful that this didn’t work out because it tells me that Senator Judd Gregg will not compromise his principles just to have a cabinet position and that those of us who are conservatives can continue to enjoy at least one staunch republican who will stand up for conservative values against the onslaught of the unbridled Democrats who will surely spend us into oblivion.

Comments Off

His First 2 Weeks

February 5, 2009 at 9:06 AM (General, political)

Now that Obama has been officially installed as president (even though question remains as to his Constitutional eligibility and more than 30 cases have or are being heard across this country), what do you think of his performance in the first two weeks:

This poll will be active for one week only. Be sure to tell all your friends…..

Comments Off

The Preamble of the Constitution

November 11, 2008 at 12:21 PM (Constitutional, Educational)
Tags: , ,

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

What does this paragraph really say? Let’s break it down by sentence or part thereof…

“We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…”

The framers of the Constitution had emigrated to these lands from the kingdom of England/Great Britain. As such, they were subject to the whims of the then king, George. King George was not only king of the land, but head of the Church of England, which was highly oppressive to the Catholics of the land. This oppression stemmed from King Henry VIII, who, disliking the fact that the Pope of the Catholic Church would not grant a him a divorce from his wife. Henry wanted a divorce because his wife could not properly produce a male heir, let alone an heir that would survive more than a few brief days. In those days, everything was blamed on the woman (nothing’s really changed! LOL). Because of his inability to obtain a divorce authorization from the Pope, he had his wife tried and convicted, then beheaded. He then established the Church of England. If anyone dared challenge the King’s authority within the Church, they took their lives into their own hands. As a result of this oppression, the Framers of the Constitution wanted to make a more perfect society. In making a more perfect society, each person could worship God in whatever manner he/she so chose without being subject to a government’s interference;

establish justice

In England, each person was judged by the head of the Church – the King, through his Archbishop. There was no defense available for the common man. The Framers sought to establish a system of justice that provided a defense for the common person.

insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense,

To ensure domestic tranquility was to prevent outbreaks of war between the several states and to develop a system of dispute resolution. They also sought to provide for the common defense by raising an army and a navy that could protect the shores of this country.

promote the general welfare,

This clause of the preamble is often taken out of context. It does NOT mean that the government should provide welfare to any person, take care of the public so that they don’t have to work, or do anything other than what the Constitution’s Articles clearly define; rather, it means that the Government should do what it can to ensure that the general population is not devoid of assistance in times of disaster or attack. It means that the government should not show partiality when making laws that could affect one state more than another.

and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity

To secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity – to free our countrymen from oppression now and at any point in the future (ourselves and our posterity). It does not mean liberalism, far-left idealism.

do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

The Framers needed to establish a Constitution in order to bind the various states together. Each state to that point had been subject both jointly and separately to the Kingdom of England as a protectorate just as Kenya was up until the Crown relinquished it and allowed it to be it’s own country. Without the Constitution – the “stick this in your mouth and chew on it a while” document, the States could not join together cohesively to fend off the British.

Your comments welcome and encouraged.

2 Comments

Maybe Someone Will Call For His Impeachment By The End of Next Week

January 19, 2009 at 10:13 AM (Constitutional, Educational, States' Rights, political)
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Yes, “Maybe someone will call for…” was a specific quote by Massimo Granellini, a reporter for an Italian newspaper regarding Barack Hussein (yes, it’s now okay to use that Arabic middle name since he has decided to use it in his swearing-in ceremony) Obama and the fact that the luster is already wearing thin on the people of Europe and the Middle East. The Iranians are already burning BHO in effigy saying that because he didn’t side with Hamas in the current Israeli/Hamas conflict that he should be killed. (What else is new? This happens with every president being installed when it comes to foreign countries burning them in effigy. But this is their Muslim “brother” as they think of him so why would they burn him in effigy? Because he didn’t come out and choose their side of the Fatwa and say that he doesn’t believe Israel should be able to exist. Besides, if Obama gets into the mix before his inauguration, he could be subject to the Logan Act which prohibits any private citizen from meddling in state affairs and attempting to circumvent or privately negotiate same on personal ambitions which Obama essentially did when he visited Iraq and tried to get the Iraqi president to delay withdrawal negotiations so that he could take credit for it).

Europeans wholeheartedly supported Obama as their pick for our country’s next presidential candidate, but they are already becoming disenamored with him because of his pre-election admission that he will NOT be able to deliver on all his promises. (What else is new? Presidential candidates in this country have always promised more than they could ever hope to deliver and the undying love for Obama will fade just as it has for every other president at some point and we, as conservatives, can only hope that undying love fades quickly.)

Some of the things we should be VERY concerned about, however, include H. J.Res 5, a resolution to do away with the 22nd amendment of the US Constitution which imposes a two-term limitation on all presidents in this country because the NY congressman who introduced it wants Obama to be able to be “president for life” should he choose to (all hail King Obama). This is a very bad precedent because it opens our country up to inherited rule (i.e., the same kind of rule in Cuba where Castro hand-picked his brother to succeed him or Hugo Chavez who has already hand-picked his successor, or even Kim Jong Il who has hand-picked his son to be his successor). We founded this country on two principle reasons: religious freedom and not having “kings” to rule for lifetimes.

There is also HJ Res 14 which threatens to reduce our Constitutional rights further by eliminating any term limits on members of the House of Representatives and Senate, essentially giving them the ability to be rulers for lifetimes, despite what any state statutes may dictate. They want to do this by essentially giving their members a “1 year” hiatus between term eligibilities – and this, in and of itself, would be allowing them to basically rule for lifetimes.

In addition, here is a website listing all of the Socialistic programs that Congress is trying to get past us without us knowing about what’s going on. Talk about “transparency” – NOT! Oh, and on that transparency issue – Obama’s proposal says that Congress would only have to allow it to be posted on a government website for 5 days AFTER it has already been passed and not before when the constituency (you and I) would be able to talk to our congressmen to tell them whether we think they should support a particular bill or not!.

The other big thing that is on the plate for which we should all be vigilent is the fact that we are only two states away from having a Constitutional Convention called. “What is this”, you ask? It is the calling of states’ representatives (as identified by each states’ legislators, chosen by their state houses/senates) to meet in Washington or Philadelphia, or some other such location, to re-work the US Constitution. Ohio will shortly be calling a vote on whether to request the ConCon themselves and then that would leave only one state to so request. The reason this is so critical is because it takes only 34 states to call for a “ConCon”. The last one was in 1787 when the Bill of Rights was adopted, protecting the citizenry from the government. What’s the harm? How about adding dozens of new amendments making same sex legal, any form of abortion legal (regardless of the term of pregnancy), doing away with presidential term limits, or (most importantly) doing away with the private citizen’s right to keep and bear arms? Even though several of the states have withdrawn their request for a Constitutional Convention, there is no provision within the Constitution itself to accept those withdrawals of request. In other words, you can request, but you can’t revoke the request. That is, admittedly, a flaw within our Constitution. And how about Mr. Obama’s pledge to re-write the Bill of Rights, made just this past weekend on Saturday when starting his whistle stop tour from Philly to DC?

Our country is so very close to implosion from accepting Socialist views and “one world government” philosophies that we are about to lose our individual identy. We could potentially no longer even be a country within the next 10 years if the plans of Marxist Socialist ideals such as that which Mr. Obama represents (read his book Dreams From My Father to see the proof of his Marxist leanings), and the supression of free speech which is already rapidly occurring throughout our secondary education system (and now in our high schools – see article in Dayton Press about the Mason High School principal revoking the ability of any student to say anything at all negative about Mr. Obama) that the death of our country is a real and present danger.

Will Mr. Obama be impeached? Not likely by our US Senate, but very likely he will be impeached by the rest of the world – and sooner than he thinks.

2 Comments

The Purge Has Begun

January 27, 2009 at 2:57 PM (Constitutional)

Madam Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has thrown down the gauntlet with her comment that contraception (aka abortion) will “stimulate” the US economy because it will have local, state, and federal governments paying less over the long haul to support those on welfare. This is social and human engineering. Did I not read somewhere or hear her say herself, that she is a Catholic? I wonder what Pope Benedict would think of her membership in the Catholic church? Would he excommunicate her for such beliefs?

Let’s do the math – Assuming the federal government increases its funding of abortions (the Dems call it contraception – I call it Socialistic State-Sponsored Abortion), we could take 1,000,000 abortions (which number is extremely conservative) at a rate of $1,000/abortion cost; this would equate to $1 billion in federal/state funding for those who can’t seem to keep their pants up and continue to cost the country for their stupidity. It does not matter the economic class of the persons benefitting from this process. By Pelosi’s math, were these pregnancies to be permitted to come to term, and these same slouchers bring up their children on the welfare dole, keeping in mind that it costs well over $100,000 to raise a child to the age of 18, she thinks we would be saving more than $100 billion to raise those 1 million welfare babies. However, that’s spread out over 18 years and, as a consequence, saves this country only somewhere around $111 million. If , on the other hand, each and every one of those babies were brought to term and adopted (or better yet, brought up by parents who understand that living off the public dole only keeps them “down” so getting a job and making a living wage is a much better option, not only for the parent but for the child(ren) as well), our country would save that $111 million for each of those years, in addition to the $1.8 trillion spent on paying for the abortions ($200,111,111,112 annual savings). Which is the better deal? Which would better stimulate the US economy – abortion or responsible parenting? Bottom line, keep your pants zipped unless you can afford to bring up a child for 18 years (or longer).

What this boils down to is social engineering and eugenics. You remember eugenics from high school, don’t you? It is the process of deciding who is worthy of remaining alive based on a false presumption by a governmental body of who can benefit the collective more over the long term. Obviously, Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Obama both agree that those in the poorer communities of our country are not really worth saving; that they are not really worth trying to assist by helping them learn how to help themselves; by handing them another ready-made opportunity to keep them downtrodden and lying about it by calling economic stimulus. I don’t think that this stimulates anything in me except anger.

Now, I’m not one who will be protesting in front of an abortion clinic anytime soon. But, for me, abortion is not, nor has it ever been, an option. I believe that each person has to weigh her options and decide for herself what she is willing to live with for the rest of her life – it is something that she needs to reconcile with Almighty God. However, I do not, nor have I ever, suggest to anyone that abortion will be the answer to all her ills and do not recommend it to anyone. I do not believe that it should be a federal right because it is not identified as such within the context of the US Constitution. In fact, the Constitution does not reference anything about it at all. The Declaration of Independence provides us the passage of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. Therefore, it is a States’ Right as to whether or not a state should allow abortion as part of its services, or permit such to be undertaken as a private measure within each state’s borders. It was liberal justices who allowed Roe v Wade to become the law of the land and it should be a measure that the SCOTUS should be ashamed of because they legislated from the bench rather than interpreting the Constitution as it was written by inserting their own beliefs into their decision.

Given the new trifecta of Democrat control (yes, “Democrat”, not “Democratic”), it is imperative for those of us who espouse conservative viewpoints to be extremely vocal, extremely strong in our standing, and inflexible to the point of breaking. By being such strong individuals, we’ll become the Republicans our founding fathers wanted us to be. We cannot permit the social engineering of SOCIALIST/MARXIST Obama and his cronies. We cannot permit the human rights violations that would proliferate under his rule. To decide that abortion would be stimulus for our economy is something from the Dark Ages and should not be permitted to flourish. Stamp out the idiocy of this new regime and run for office against it in 2010 at all levels.

Comments Off

Your Medical Information & Right To Privacy

January 30, 2009 at 6:46 AM (Constitutional, Educational, political)
Tags: , , , , ,

If you are one who desires to keep your medical information private (and who, in their right mind would not want to keep their medical details private from all but their doctor, insurance and theirself?), then you should be aware that the new “stimulus” package that the House Democrats just passed contains a provision mandating the turning over of all your medical records to the federal government, HHSA (Health & Human Services Administration) to build this so-called “universal healthcare” program that Obama wants to start. There is NO OPT OUT PROVISION in this package. So, even if you carry private insurance and won’t be participating in this universal healthcare program, your information will become part of the government’s database. This database can then potentially be used to deny you coverage for anything at all. What you may not realize is that even if you don’t participate in this universal healthcare government insurance program that Obama is trying to enact, your private insurance will be forced to go through a goverment clearing house to obtain their premiums and to dole out your coverage to your providers. This is a complete nationalization of the health care program (read SOCIALISM) and makes you subject to the whims of a governmental system that cannot keep track of what it spends now (that’s another topic). Beware – Big Brother is taking over your life without you even knowing about it.

Comments Off

The Wedding Is Off!

February 4, 2009 at 12:18 PM (General, political)
Tags: , , , ,

You remember the in the movies how either the bride or groom gets left at the altar? Well, the groom in this case is Obama and the bride is the dominant liberal mass media (aka the White House Press Corps). The gloves have come off between the press secretary Robert Gibbs and the press who have their digs in the basement levels of the White House who grill him every day.

Needless to say, Robert Gibbs has a very real tendency to come into the press briefings completely unprepared for what he’s going to be asked about. I’m actually quite pleased with this little scene. It tells me a couple of things:

1) The actual press hounds who live, eat, and breath the White House press life are no more married to Obama’s administration than I am; and

2) Sooner or later, Gibbs is really going to screw up; and

3) The dominant liberal mass media (Rush calls them “drive by media”) are eventually going to tire of not getting a straight answer from Obama’s lackey, Robert Gibbs.

I can say all this with complete confidence because I have been going to www.whitehouse.gov and reviewing the daily press briefings. It’s pretty sad stuff to see. Mr. Gibbs has had an obvious lack of public speaking; has difficulty speaking to large groups (let alone small groups); cannot complete a sentence without stumbling and re-tracing what he said then starting over; gets miffed when a press hound pursues a line of questioning; and obviously has no clue what’s really going on in the White House because he’s not getting the information he needs to be well-enough informed to entertain any question put to him.

His favorite response seems to be, “I’ll look into that and get back to you”; however, I have yet to read where he has actually followed up on anything and reported back to the press corps in the White House. If he is following up, he is not being the “transparent” press secretary that he is supposed to be. There are no follow-ups to anything put to him in the transcripts of the press briefings, nor in subsequent press briefings. So, either he’s avoiding coming up with an answer or he simply doesn’t want to admit that he is so totally not worth spit when it comes to being a press secretary. A press secretary is supposed to be able to entertain any question put to him/her. His predecessors certainly were.

If the dominant liberal mass media doesn’t start getting real answers concerning this lie of a “stimulus” bill; the escalation of conflict in Afghanistan; the shifting of military priorities; the tax scandals that seem to be now plaguing all of the nominees and still dogging Geithner (yes – the press is continuing to pursue this one!), they will turn on Obama like a great white shark on a bee-line for the new seal pups that are the White House cabinet members.

Picture it now – the great white is circling, coming in closer and closer, but deep down in the ocean and it sees this dark form near the surface of the water – it’s a seal pup named Obama (or maybe Gibbs). The shark shifts into high speed and comes up from beneath the form and launches itself and the seal pup out of the water all the while cutting death strikes into the sides of the baby seal. Nature will take its course. The press is already becoming disenchanted with Obama’s people and, before long, they will go after the ‘One’ himself.

Maybe then they’ll decide to finally vett this person whom they have so lovingly placed upon a pedestal and proclaimed to be the governmental equivalent of the Messiah. Even Jesus was flailed and ridiculed (and eventually crucified).

Comments Off

Ms Garafalo

May 12, 2009 at 9:42 AM (political)
Tags: , , , ,

What makes Jeanine Garafalo an expert in racism? Absolutely nothing. She is given her 15 minutes of fame because she is supposedly a comedienne and for no other reason. She, herself, could be labeled a bigot for her insensitive and insane comments about those who opted to protest to preserve our country’s founding principles. To label an entire group of people as being racist for one person having created a sign saying, “what you talking ’bout willis?” is tatamount to calling an entire group of persons, equally protected under our country’s Constitution, the very thing she purports to be in favor of – equal protection. It’s a dog chasing its tail. In fact, she called everyone who protested “tea baggers”, which term is quite often associated with a known homosexual act whereby one (male) places his genetalia into the mouth of another person (also male). Shouldn’t the homosexual community be offended by her comments just as much as those who exercised their right of free speech and freedom of assembly to protest practices of this governmental administration and it’s lackeys (read Pelosi/Reid/Frank) power-grabbing, power-hungry attempt to turn our country into a replica of the Marxist regime that was once the Soviet Union? We all know how that one turned out, don’t we. Socialism (big or little “s”) doesn’t work. We’ve seen millions suffer because of some totalitarian regimes’ attempts to equalize the playing field for everyone via income redistribution. This new administration is making every possible move in its first six months of power to grab every possible dollar from every possible mouth while those in power suckle on wagu beef and champagne on Wednesday afternoons at the White House. Those who gladly align themselves with the far left are in for a rude awakening one day – they will have only as much as the government allows them to have. That’s why Barney Frank and his ilk are going after taxing anything they can on the internet, regulating the internet into Big Brother G4 and wanting to tag our babies ears with micro-chips when they’re born (ostensibly to be able to identify a stolen child). Don’t believe anything you hear about wanting to help anyone in need. The only ones being helped are those who bend over and kiss the butts of those in power – and then only to the extent that those in power will permit. This is as it always has been in the world of a socialist society. You are loved only as long as you bring others into the fold and, if you are not all loyal and all supplicant in nature, your usefulness evaporates.

Keep your fork – you’ll need it to pick up the “cake” that will be left in the ovens of socialist government excesses – Vive la Peron is their battle cry – mine is Vive la Freedom!

Comments Off

« Older entries